clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Looking at Rutgers' facilities vs. the B1G: Track and Field Hockey

New, 6 comments

Every sport needs something as they enter the Big Ten, some more than others and some more pressing than others. So we continue to look at Olympic sports and their needs. This time, track & field and field hockey. And don't get flustered that this isn't about football. Just read the article and comment. Football doesn't even report 'til tomorrow!

Nice signage.  A lot better than the site it represents.
Nice signage. A lot better than the site it represents.
rvc73

The two sports under consideration here are not at the top of Rutgers squads in terms of results.  This year, Corey Crawford put RU in the scoring column at the NCAA Outdoor championships.  But in the AAC outdoor championships, the men finished sixth of 8, the women women 6 of 8.  The women didn't score at the NCAA championships.

Field Hockey is facing a daunting challenge in the Big Ten.  ttfp ranked 9th in the final 2013 rankings.  Three current B1G squads made the NCAA tournament (incl MD), and the Twerps made the final four in field hockey.  As a conference, the B1G has won 10 NCAA titles (again, if you include MD).  There were 36 final four positions earned by the B1G out of 132  (27%) since the FH tourney began.  In the final 2013 rankings, 6 B1G teams were in the Top 25.  RU was 44.

Track and Field and Field Hockey share a facility, the Bauer Track and Field Complex. Field hockey has been there since 2009, but the sign (see above) hasn't been updated.  Sharing a facility isn't a problem, since other schools have similar arrangements.  Prior to the move to the Bauer Complex across the street from the RAC, the team played at the Stadium Complex on the artificial turf field, a surface that was not meant for field hockey.  When the team relocated several years ago, the turf was upgraded for field hockey , and it is a state-of-the-art surface.

And just like baseball, the surface is terrific.  But the rest of the facility is hardly a Division 1 site.

The entrance to Bauer Track and Field Complex (again, the sign doesn't even mention field hockey)

Dsc01537_medium

And fan amenities.  Really, that's it.  Four porta-potties. Plus the water fountain not far from the flag poles.

Dsc01539_medium

Let's not forget the deferred maintenance needed to clean it up:

Dsc01538_medium

And the viewing area for fans:

Dsc01541_medium

No press box, no lights, no scoreboard for track (there is a relatively new one for field hockey).  There are high school facilities that are more inviting and well-appointed than the newest member to the Big Ten.  And then, of course, there is the competition in the Big Ten, such as:

Michigan State - Track and Field Hockey

Mich_st_medium

Somewhere in the middle of Pennsylvania

Penn_state_medium

Maryland - 8 time NCAA Champions

Maryland_medium

Iowa

Iowa_grant-field-01_medium

tOSU - Jesse Owens Track and Soccer Stadium (yes, Jesse Owens went there)

Osu_jesse_owens_tf_soc_lax_medium

Minnesota

Minnesota_outddor_medium

Michigan - with a training facility dedicated to field hockey

Michigan_training_medium

All in all, not a pretty picture.  And, yes, we're fighting from behind, going up against the big money folks of the Big Ten. But, what do you do?  If you put in lights and upgrade the seating, you can at least host contests and not be completely embarrassed by people saying, "This is a Division 1 school?"  Summer camps, rentals to club teams at night, state high school track meets.  Lots of possibilities, and probably not for that much money.  As a start.

Now don't get me started on indoor facilities.  Too late.  That's another piece for later on.